It
is surprising how, over a period of time, governance is defined less and less
by the long term betterment of the governed and increasingly in terms of the
exorbitant greed and narrow perspectives of the unscrupulous who govern. A
certain amount of corruption is acceptable in any form of democratic government
and it has been proven often that a little bit of grey spotting in the space
between the black and white is motivation for progress and helps things move
along smoothly. We have however arrive into an eon where the fundamental
outcome has become one of extreme greed and power mongering.
It
is disappointing to see a nation built on the sacrifice of many thousands and
fought for by great leaders, a nation that was the seat of civilization, a
nation that has been the cradle of some of the greatest of mathematical and
philo sophical doctrines, fall to such stupor over money feeding greed for more
power aimed at greater amounts of money. And where there is money, darkness and
evil find its way to create an extreme downward spiral that sustains itself
while spinning everything that it touches completely out of control.
What
have we elected to lead our nation? Or have we elected at all? In a thought
proving discussion some time back, I was attempting to define the modal class
of voters in the country – who is the single largest group of voters that can
be discretely characterized? This single largest group or profile of voters is
who decides the fate of the leadership that governs our fate.
Not
supported by anything other than my educated guesstimate and conviction born of
having read enough statistics from different sources, the average voter is a
person who is educated somewhere between incomplete school education and an
incomplete college education, struggling to make ends meet for himself and a
family of at least two through some form of unskilled or semi-skilled labor –
possibly residing without access to most, if not all, amenities of comfort like
24 hour good quality water, round the clock electricity, good infrastructure
and without access to a dream or hope of a better future. Whether this exact
electorate exists to fit into the profile, I am not sure, but the collective
consciousness that is defined thus will decide the fate of the elected leadership.
The collective consciousness may be bolstered by subsets of the stated
characteristics or be defined by intersections with samples flanking the
defined median; it can be represented by any of the hundreds of our demographic
markups or geographic boundaries or can be part or full of any cross section of
the population that we can study.
It
is at this playing field that fate and future of our country is being bartered
through material or abstract promises. It is this population, without access to
a source of information surrounding current affairs or the intellect to tell
fact from propaganda and without the will to exercise informed macro choices,
beyond those that are basic sustenance related, that builds the numbers when it
comes to electoral turnout. And therein lies the truth of Winston Churchill’s
realizations that the best argument against democracy is 5 minutes spent with
the average voter. It is this voter who is building the numbers of electoral
turnouts and it is among them that the future and present of our nation is
being nickel and dimed by those who have inherited the money and power to buy and sell votes.
While
we are proud of the fact of being the world’s most complex and largest
democracy, and given the opportunity, holler it to anyone who will lend a
listening ear, we are probably one of the worst performing democratic
machineries in terms of outcomes – progress, transparency, electoral maturity
and the true ability to make a free choice of leadership. And the leading cause
is the stark unavailability of decision driving intellect or information with
the median voter. To be able to drive true universal adult franchise through
informed decision-making, we must first ensure that the average median voter is
informed and can comprehend the truth (the facts without prejudice) and be
given the ability to drive accountability of the elected. Without media, rules
and controls that can separate fact from propaganda intelligibly to the median
voter, democracy is largely a non-inclusive farce being sponsored by the taxpayer’s
money.
No comments:
Post a Comment